Through their lawyer, KRA did tell the court that SportyBet under-declared their incomes for the period between 2018 and 2021 and thus needed preservation of the funds to avoid being transferred out of the country. Upon analysis of the tax information collected from the firm’s bankers and pay bill accounts, it was noted that there was a huge variance between deposits and self-declarations. Additionally, SportyBet had no known assets in the country except the money in the six bank accounts and pay bill numbers.
In response, the betting firm told the court that their platforms are fully integrated with the KRA I-tax System Integration Data Report, which provides real-time information. KRA did issue three assessment notices; the latest one was in August, thus refuting claims the company wanted to close its Kenya operations and that they are serial defaulters. Also, all its directors are Kenyans, including one who is a foreigner.
In connection to variances, SportyBet did explain that there were internal transfers that do happen in their various pay bills, and counting all these transactions will result in counting the same fund many times over. Also, it is possible for a customer to deposit and not utilize the whole amount as a stake. This pay bill transaction is not a net income.
Finally, the firm claims KRA incorrectly used Ksh 7.3 Billion as the amount for computing withholding tax on winnings. The correct gross payouts are Ksh 1.9 billion as per the Betting Control and Licensing Board returns.
The freeze was extended by the court until it rules on the application, on which day the parties will be notified.
Check out the latest news here and you are welcome to join our super exclusive iGaming Afrika Telegram Forum for all the latest and breaking news in the African Gambling industry. We would also like to hear from you, Write to [email protected] KRA Sportybet